hearing my name,
i turned around, reached out my hands to get the blue papers which holds 20% of my overall score.

i have underperformed.a careless costs me 6.5 marks..if i had not wrote those 3 words.
and worst of all, my project got a b-
don't know if my mid terms can pull it up.
and my group seems to have conflict but the good thing is that it is already the last week of the semester.

so let me use this chance to revise for ob.
using the team effectiveness model.
starts with
Team Environment:
under communication, we had face to face communication but most of it is through emails and chatting on msn. which i guess was one of the reason of our failure
emotion intelligence seems to be lacking as it is obvious that there are others who were feeling unhappy.( i think i feel it..)
while under reward which is 15% of our overall marks..hmm is it a good motivation for us? results had shown that it has not been a good motivator.
leadership?i guessed we had shared leadership.

Team Design:
Task characteristic - complex because we required knowledge about earnings management and accounting knowledge. and we also have reciprocal interdependence as work is being exchanged around through email
Same goal-get it done and do it well..and we are a group of 5(small)( Team size)
Team composition-
i guess we are cooperative.everyone did their part and have unanimous agreement.while communicating is basically through email which i guessed was bad.even though there was better communication between my friend and i because perhaps we are both year 1, accounting student ( team cohesiveness -member similarity) and we are tasked to the same work.
we do have team diversity-marketing student and accounting student, so we do have different perspectives on several things.(for example implications of risk...)

Team Process:
team development..hmm i thnk we did go through the 5 stages..
team norms:
we shared food during seminars
my experience-last semester, my group project was poorly done..so i guessed that perhaps this semester might be similar which happened so( negative self-fulfilling prophecy?)

team cohesion
we didn't have team success nor much similarity( which i mentioned earlier)
we did not have any team building as well..i guess

team trust
i guess we have knowledge based trust, we knew who is better for the module who is not..


now all depends on the final paper.
i will have to finish one paper td

gambatte!7 days left.time flies